ENGAGE IO vs Tatsu for Web3
A typical web3 setup runs 5 servers. Tatsu costs monthly, 5 servers $24.95/mo (Server Plus × 5), against $0 for ENGAGE IO's engagement features.
The gap that matters for web3 servers
Five servers with different purposes need different rules, and Tatsu's XP is global by design, so a member's standing is not scoped to the community you are running. There is no wallet verification for governance weight, no quest engine for incentive programmes, and campaign reporting is leaderboard scores. Tatsu does have a public API for profile and points data, which is more than most of this set offers.
What Tatsu costs at web3 scale
Five servers on Server Plus is $24.95 a month and $299.40 a year; on Server Premium it is $44.95 a month. That buys activity roles and earn bonuses, not the wallet gating or quest tracking a protocol's contributor programme runs on, so the incentive stack needs a second vendor regardless.
Setup and migration for a web3 server
If Tatsu stays, keep it on the social server and keep governance and contributor servers on wallet-derived roles. Its public API is the one integration point worth using: profile and points data can be pulled for reporting, though it describes chat activity rather than contribution.
The switching mistake web3 servers make
A game-like currency in a Web3 server is easy to confuse with a token, and members will ask whether balances are on-chain. Answer that in writing before migrating, because the migration announcement is when the question gets asked in public.
| Cost line | Tatsu | ENGAGE IO |
|---|---|---|
| Tatsu monthly, 5 servers | $24.95/mo (Server Plus × 5) | $0 |
| Tatsu effective monthly, 5 web3 servers | $24.95 on the cheapest published billing | $0 |
| Tatsu three-year total, 5 web3 servers | $898.20 | $0 |
| Tatsu per web3 server per year | $59.88 | $0 |
| Tatsu per 1,000 web3 members per year | $11.98 at ~25,000 members | $0 |
Server subscriptions apply per server, while user subscriptions follow the individual across every server. This is the only bot in this set where members can pay to increase their own earn rate.
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Document before migrating | Whether balances are on-chain (they are not) |
| Conversion | Off-chain points, stated rate |
| Overlap period | 7 days |
FAQ
Can Tatsu assign roles from token holdings?▼
No. There is no wallet linking or holder verification, so governance and contributor access cannot be derived from on-chain balances. ENGAGE IO reads ownership and assigns the role, which is what a gated proposal channel requires.
Does Tatsu have an API for a DAO's reporting?▼
Yes, Tatsu publishes an API for profile and points data, which is unusual in this comparison. The limitation is what the data represents: chat-driven global XP rather than verified contribution to your protocol.
Includes a 2-week premium trial when you add the bot.
Pricing and feature limits verified on from the vendor's own pricing page. Vendors change prices without notice; check the source before budgeting.
Related
ENGAGE IO vs Tatsu
Free tier; Server Plus $4.99/mo, Server Premium $8.99/mo; user subscriptions $4.99-$39.99/mo
Discord Engagement Bot for Web3 Projects
Grow on-chain communities with automated quests, points, and cross-platform campaigns.…
ENGAGE IO vs Guilded for Web3
No longer available. Guilded shut down on 19 December 2025.
ENGAGE IO vs Zealy for Web3
Free tier ($0, 1,000 claim credits/mo); Standard from $149/mo billed annually; Plus from $359/mo billed annually; Enterprise custom
ENGAGE IO vs Tatsu for Creator
Streamers, YouTubers, and influencer communities that monetize engagement through rewards …
ENGAGE IO vs Tatsu for SaaS Startups
SaaS companies running community-led growth, beta programs, and user feedback loops on Dis…